The America Invents Act (“AIA) provided an accused infringer sued for patent infringement (“Patent Challenger”) with a new, alternative forum to challenge the patents asserted against them: inter partes review (“IPR”). In exchange—and to avoid duplicative parallel district court and Patent Office proceedings—the AIA provided upon a final written decision, the Patent Challenger would be

Sixty-seven patent infringement trials reached a jury verdict in 2024. Of these 67 patent infringement verdicts, thirty-one (approximately 46%) were a complete patent owner win on all patent infringement and validity issues. Twenty verdicts (approximately 29%) were a win for the patent challenger, defined as no award of patent infringement damages by the jury. The remaining seventeen jury verdicts (approximately 25%) reflected a mixed result on infringement and/or validity, with the jury awarding the patent owner at least some patent infringement damages.Continue Reading The Year in Review: 2024 Patent Litigation Verdicts

Winstead PC, a leading Texas-based law firm with national practices serving clients across the country, announced that the firm’s client, StreamScale, won a $240 million jury verdict in a major patent case against Cloudera, a California based data-management company.

The jury determined that Cloudera had infringed on three StreamScale patents related to its cloud-based data